The United States Army is advancing its modernization priorities with plans for a critical demonstration in 2026 to evaluate contenders for a new class of ‘ultra long-range’ Launched Effects (LE). This initiative represents a significant evolution in Army doctrine, aiming to equip commanders with attritable, long-endurance unmanned systems capable of penetrating deep into contested enemy territory. Launched Effects are a family of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) designed to be deployed from other platforms, such as helicopters, ground vehicles, or fixed-wing aircraft, to perform a variety of missions including reconnaissance, electronic warfare, and kinetic strikes. The push towards an ‘ultra long-range’ capability underscores a strategic shift, driven by the challenges of peer competition and the need to project power across the vast distances characteristic of theaters like the Indo-Pacific.
This planned demonstration is not merely a technical exercise; it is a pivotal step in the Army’s effort to build a credible stand-off capability that can sense, target, and strike adversaries from ranges that minimize risk to crewed assets. By developing systems that can operate hundreds of kilometers beyond the forward line of troops, the Army seeks to create tactical and operational dilemmas for adversaries, enabling Multi-Domain Operations and contributing directly to the joint force’s ability to dismantle sophisticated Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) networks. The outcome of the 2026 event will heavily influence future procurement decisions and shape the Army’s combat aviation and long-range fires posture for decades to come.
From Tactical Enablers to Strategic Assets
The concept of Launched Effects has evolved considerably over the past decade. Initially conceived as Air-Launched Effects (ALEs) to support the Future Vertical Lift (FVL) ecosystem, these systems were envisioned as tactical enablers for platforms like the now-canceled Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA). They were intended to act as robotic scouts, extending the sensor range of crewed helicopters and allowing them to remain outside the reach of immediate threats. However, the strategic landscape has driven an expansion of this concept. The Army now categorizes LEs in a tiered approach—short, medium, and long-range—to serve different echelons and operational needs, including ground-launched variants.
The planned demonstration for an ‘ultra long-range’ system represents the most ambitious tier of this strategy. While shorter-range LEs are focused on the tactical fight, this new class of asset is being designed for the operational and strategic levels. It reflects a doctrinal shift recognizing that the Army must contribute to the ‘deep fight’ by providing its own deep-sensing and deep-strike capabilities. This evolution aligns with the service’s broader emphasis on Long-Range Precision Fires (LRPF), creating a symbiotic relationship where ultra long-range LEs can provide the necessary intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) and targeting data for assets like the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM).
Extending the Battlefield: The Strategic Imperative
The strategic imperative for an ultra long-range LE is clear: to ensure relevance and effectiveness in a high-intensity conflict against a peer adversary. In a potential conflict in the Indo-Pacific, for example, the tyranny of distance and robust A2/AD systems would severely constrain the operational freedom of traditional assets. An ultra long-range LE, launched from a safe standoff distance, could penetrate these defenses to locate and track mobile targets, disrupt enemy command and control networks through electronic attack, or act as a decoy to saturate integrated air defense systems. This capability allows the Army to shape the battlefield before committing ground forces and provides the joint force commander with flexible and persistent options.
Economically, the attritable nature of these systems is a key driver. Instead of risking a multi-million-dollar crewed aircraft or a high-end, non-expendable drone, the Army can use a larger number of lower-cost LEs to achieve its objectives. This ‘mass over exquisite’ approach complicates enemy defensive calculations and allows for greater risk tolerance in complex missions. The 2026 demonstration will be crucial in validating whether industry can deliver this combination of range, performance, and affordability at scale.
Key Actors and the Path Forward
The primary stakeholder within the military is the U.S. Army, with key organizations like the Program Executive Office (PEO) for Aviation and the Future Vertical Lift Cross-Functional Team likely leading the effort. The demonstration’s ‘contender’ framing indicates a competitive approach designed to spur innovation and leverage the strengths of a diverse industrial base. While specific companies for the 2026 event have not been named, the field of potential participants includes major defense primes with extensive experience in UAS and missile technology, as well as non-traditional defense contractors specializing in autonomous systems and artificial intelligence.
A successful demonstration in 2026 would likely trigger the formal establishment of a program of record and a subsequent down-select for production. However, significant technical and programmatic hurdles remain. Ensuring resilient and secure command and control over extreme distances, achieving a high degree of autonomous operation to reduce operator burden, and ensuring the survivability of the platform in contested airspace are all critical challenges that must be addressed. Furthermore, integrating these systems into the Army’s broader network architecture and the Pentagon’s Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) concept will be essential to realizing their full potential.
Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Army Modernization
The planned 2026 demonstration of ultra long-range Launched Effects contenders is more than a simple technology showcase; it is a defining moment for the U.S. Army’s modernization strategy. It represents the culmination of years of doctrinal development and a clear-eyed assessment of the demands of future warfare. By pursuing this capability, the Army is seeking to provide a credible, cost-effective solution to the challenge of projecting power in highly contested environments.
The path from demonstration to widespread fielding will be complex, requiring sustained investment and the resolution of significant technical challenges. However, the strategic payoff is immense. A successful ultra long-range LE program would provide the Army with an organic deep-strike and sensing capability, enhancing its contribution to the joint force and ensuring its continued relevance on the 21st-century battlefield. The defense industry and strategic planners alike will be watching the 2026 event with keen interest, as its outcome will signal the future direction of unmanned systems in modern warfare.
Source
